![]() Text and photographs copyright of Jim Shead. |
|
Description: The River runs over 27 miles from Hertford to Limehouse Basin, where it joins the Thames. There are a number of tributaries and connecting waterways.
History: Promoted under Acts of 1424, 1430, 1571, 1739, 1767,1779, 1805 and 1850.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
River Lee
1424 | Promoted under Acts. | |
1430 | Promoted under Act. | |
1571 | Promoted under Act. | |
1733 | Surveyed the river. Later he tendered for the erection of a flash lock, providing a model with the tender, which was accepted. | |
1739 | Promoted under Act. | |
4 August 1740 | Is recorded as being surveyor to Trust. | |
1757 | Was appointed surveyor following the death of William Whittenbury. | |
5 August 1765 | He was asked to make a survey "so as to settle the navigation on a new plan as will be most conducive to the good of the public". | |
16 July 1766 | He was asked to survey the navigation with Thomas Yeoman as his assistant. | |
16 July 1766 | He was asked to survey the navigation as assistant to John Smeaton. | |
September 1766 | He reported the results of his survey of the navigation, which was developd before the use of pound-locks. He found eighteen flashes at weir and staunches, as well as a lock at Ware and tide-gates at Bromley. He recommended that new cuts should be made (including from Bromley to the Thames and Limehouse, and at Hackney, Edmonton and Waltham Abbey) and the replacement of flash-locks with pound-locks. | |
1767 | Promoted under Act. | |
1 July 1767 | He was elected surveyor and collector for the new river trustees. | |
25 February 1769 | Was appointed assistant to Thomas Yeoman at a salary of £80 a year and was given £21 for removal expenses from Portsmouth. | |
1771 | Was appointed Engineer following Thomas Yeoman in the post. | |
Late July 1771 | He resigned from his post of surveyor. | |
1779 | Promoted under Act. | |
December 1779 | Was appointed engineer at £120 a year and was given the task of repairing most of the locks. | |
December 1779 | He was blamed for the unsatisfactory state of the navigation and was dismissed after showing the river to his successor, John Glynn. | |
August 1784 | On the death of his father he succeeded to the post of engineer. | |
April 1791 | He had previously been foreman but was now acting as surveyor due to John Glynn's illness. | |
September 1791 | He was formally appointed surveyor. | |
After 1799 | He was asked to survey the river to see if it could be flooded as a defence against an invasion by Napoleon. He raised a number of objections to such a scheme but the government went ahead with the works although they were never completed. | |
15 September 1804 | Following a survey of the navigaion he made a report proposing two new cuts. The first was to avoid the mills and millstreams at Enfield, Tottenham and Lee Bridge. The second was to avoid the course from Old Ford to Bow Bridge. No actiion was taken on this. | |
1805 | Promoted under Act. | |
1844 | Assisted by James Griggs, the Lee surveyor, he surveyed the river and recommended that the number of locks be reduced to 17 from the 25 principal locks and 3 half locks. He also recommended line straightening and a 7 feet depth to allow 100-ton barges to use the river. | |
1844 | He assists Francis Giles with a survey of the river. | |
1850 | Promoted under Act. | |
1850 | He wrote a report recommending improvements to the river. | |
7 September 1850 | Appointed engineer. | |
18 March 1851 | Promoted to surveyor. | |
10 September 1864 | Rammey Marsh Lock opened. Part of a series of major improvements to the navigation that he undertook, starting in 1850. | |
1916 | The Rivers Lea & Stort. By P Bonthron. First published. | |
1980 | IWA Nationl Festival in the Lea Valley. | |
1989 | IWA National Festival at Waltham Abbey. | |
1994 | IWA National Festival at Waltham Abbey. | |
2000 | The IWA National Festival at Watham Abbey. | |
Description: This branch runs 3.25 miles from Hazelhurst Junction, where it joins the Caldon Branch of the Trent and Mersey Canal, to Leek Wharves.
History: Started around 1797
1797 | Started around 1797. | |
Description: The original, 9.25 miles, River Soar navigation from Loughborough to the Trent, now part of the G.U. Leicestershire Section.
History: Authorised by Acts of 1766 (river improvements) and 1776 (canal work), opened in 1780. Became part of the Grand Union Canal in 1932.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
1766 | Authorised by Act (river improvements). | |
1776 | Authorised by Act (canal work). | |
1776 | He was appointed engineer to build the navigation on contract. | |
1777 | He was put in charge of the building of Redhill Lock and other improvements, as recommended by William Jessop, and employed contractors to do the work. | |
Late 1777 | He was called in to suggest improvements to the navigation and advised the building of a new lock at Redhill and the deepening of the upper canal to act as a reservoir. | |
After December 1777 | He was thought too slow and was replaced. | |
1780 | Opened. | |
1819 | As company engineer he reports that the navigation at Long Whatton and Kegworth bridge was dangerous and inconvenient and could be improved by new cuts. | |
April 1826 | It was reported that his new cut and bridge at Kegworth had been completed in a very efficient and workmanlike manner. | |
1846 | He proposed to the company that they, together with the Leicester company and himself, should jointly build a railway line from Derby to Rugby along the Soar valley. | |
1916 | Leicestershire Waterways. By P Bonthron. First published. | |
1932 | Became part of the Grand Union Canal. | |
Description: Was a six mile cut from the river Teifi near Llechryd, Cardiganshire, to a tinplate works at Castle Malgwyn. Thought to have carried barges but may have been a water channel.
History: Built about 1772.
1772 | Built about 1772. | |
Description: Various propsals for canals in the Loughor valley none of which ever came to fruition.
History: In 1770 the first proposal was made for acanal from coal mines at Ammanford to the navigable River Loughor. This was followed in 1793, 1810, 1817 and 1824 by other canal proposals none of which were ever authorised or built.
Early 1793 | He was called in to survey a canal from Pen-coed to Llandovery. There were to be two branches one from Pontardulias up the valley of the Gwili to Myndd Marw and the other from Kidwelly up the Gwendraeth. |
Description: Runs 7 miles, from the junction with the Leeds & Liverpool Canal main line at Wigan, to Leigh, where it joins the Stretford and Leigh Branch of the Bridgewater Canal.
1801 | He estimated the cost of the branch with two locks at £29,826. |
Description: Was a 3 mile canal from collieries at Lansamlet, Glamorganshire, to the River Tawe at Foxhole, near Swansea.
History: Completed about 1784, closed about 1852.
1784 | Completed about 1784. | |
1852 | Closed about 1852. | |
Description: Also called the Lower Douglas Navigation, this 11 mile canal runs from Burscough Bridge, where it joins the Leeds and Liverpool Canal main line to the River Ribble Estuary.
October 1781 | He reports the construction of branch has been completed. | |
December 1796 | He reported that a canal was proposed from the Lancaster Canal to the Ribble opposite the Douglas outfall. He suggested that the Leeds & Liverpool could improve the Douglas up to Sollom lock by an artifical cut and thus provide a route between the two canals. |
Description: A half mile branch at Skipton.
History: Agents of Lord Thanet, then a minor and owner of Skipton Castle, obtained an Act on 10 May 1773 but the branch was not opened until 1797.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
1773 | Agents of Lord Thanet, then a minor and owner of Skipton Castle, obtained an Act on 10 May 1773. | |
1797 | Opened. | |
Description: Proposed a s a 46 mile narrow canal from Kington, Herefordshire, via Leominster to Stourport.
History: Authorised by an Act of 1791, part open in 1794 and 18.5 miles, and 16 locks, open by 1796 but no further progress, or connection to any other waterway, was made. Closed in 1859.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
20 December 1777 | He proposed a canal from Hereford through Leominster and Pensax to Stourport. | |
Autumn 1789 | Made a survet and an estimate for a 31 mile canal with three tunnels the whole costing £83,000. | |
1790 | Following proposals for a canal from Kington to Leominster the two schemes were amalgumated and he produced plans and estimates for a 46 mile canal rising 46 feet from Kington then falling 496 feet to the Severn. | |
1791 | Authorised by an Act. | |
July 1791 | He started construction of the canal as its engineer. | |
1794 | Part open. | |
December 1795 | John Rennie criticised his work on the canal. | |
December 1795 | Following proplems with the construction of the canal he was asked to advise. He was critical of Thomas Dadford junior's work and estimated that £20,000 was needed to complete the Southnet to Leominster section and £135,937 to finish the rest. | |
1796 | 18.5 miles, and 16 locks, open by 1796 but no further progress, or connection to any other waterway, was made. | |
1803 | He suggests tramroads as a cheaper alternative to canal cutting for connecting the canal to Kington and Stourport. An Act was passed in August to authorise the building of these tramroads. | |
27 February 1834 | He was asked to survey the route from the Rea Aqueduct at Newnham to connect the canal to the River Severn. He reported in early August. | |
March 1835 | He produced a report (while working as engineer of the Staffordshie & Worcestershire Canal) on a cheaper version of the Leominster Canal to the Severn tramroad. The cheapest option was £44,394. The idea was not taken further. | |
1859 | Closed. | |
Description: A proposal for a 3½ mile ship canal from Poulton Ring (Morecambe) across the peninsula to the Lune where a dam across the river would hold back the water to maintain deep moorings at Lancaster Quays.
History: It started as one of three rival schemes for improving transport to Lancaster. In 1845 the Morecambe Bay Harbour Company was floated with a capital of £300,000 to make a harbour and ship canal to Lancaster. The idea did not last long as when the formal company prospectus was issued in November the ship canal had been replaced by a railway.
1845 | He attacked the plans for a new dock at Thornbush, Lancaster, and pressed for the ship canal scheme on behalf of the North Western Railway. |
Description: A proposed a by-pass canal, for craft of 200 tons, from Monkey Island, below Maidenhead, to Isleworth.
History: The route was surveyed in 1770 by Brindley but no Bill was ever put to parliament.
Early 1770 | He was asked by the city of London to suggest how navigation of the lower Thames could be improved. In June he proposed a by-pass canal, for craft of 200 tons, from Monkey Island, below Maidenhead, to Isleworth. He estimated the cost at £47,885 including branches to the river at Windsor and Staines. |
History: Authorised by an Act of May 1793, work did not start until 1823 and the branch was opened in June 1826.
1793 | Authorised by an Act of May 1793. | |
1823 | Work started. | |
1826 | The branch was opened in June 1826 | |
Description: A 22.5 mile tributary of the Great Ouse. Currently only navigable for 13 miles.
History: Acts relating to navigation were passed in 1670, 1751 and 1810.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
1670 | The first act was passed relating to navigation on the river. | |
1751 | A second act was passed to make the river navigable and to appoint commissioners. | |
1810 | A third act was passed relating to navigation on the river. | |
Description: Various plans for a canal linking London to Portsmouth. See also London to Portsmouth Ship Canal schemes and London & Southampton Ports Junction Canal project. Never authorised or built.
History: In 1803 John Rennie propsed a 100 mile canal with 41 locks from the Croydon Canal to Portsmouth. In 1810 he revived and revised the scheme as the Grand Southern Canal from the Medway to Portsmouth.
1803 | He put forward a canal route to rival William Jessop's proposal for a railway connection. The canal was to be 100 mile long with 41 locks and a 4,400 yard tunnel between Coulsdon and Merstham. From the Croydon Canal it was to run through Merstham, Crawley, Ifield, Horsham Common, Pulborough, Mundham, Chichester, Emsworth and Havant to Portsmouth. He also suggested branches to the Medway, Ouse, Adur and Arun. He estimates the cost without branches to be £720,649 for a broad canal and £571,621 for a narrow canal. | |
15 March 1804 | The Bill for his planned canal was defeated. |
Description: Was an underground canal in a lead mine at Arkengarthdale, Richmond, Yorkshire.
History: Closed around 1860.
1860 | Closed around 1860. | |
Description: Various proposals for a ship canal which was never built.
History: From 1823 to 1828 the scheme was discussed but never got the financial backing it required.
Late 1824 | Published a preliminary report proposing a canal 28 feet deep and around 150 foot wide with about four locks 300 feet long by 64 feet wide. | |
Autumn 1824 | He criticised James Elme's plan for a tida ship canal and soon afterwards announced his own Grand Ship Canal from London to Arundel Bay. | |
Autumn 1824 | He produced a plan for a ship canal costing £4m or £5m. | |
1825 | He was asked to take the levels for the combined scheme of John Rennie, James Elmes and N W Cundy. | |
March 1825 | He proposes, with his brother, "a ship canal from London to Portsmouth, capable of conveying Line of Battleships and the largest Merchantmen" 86 miles long, 300 feet wide and 24 feet deep. The route was to be via Guildford, Loxwood and the Avon Valley. The cost was estimated at £7 millon. They were later asked to survey alternative lines. | |
March 1825 | He proposes, with his brother, "a ship canal from London to Portsmouth, capable of conveying Line of Battleships and the largest Merchantmen" 86 miles long, 300 feet wide and 24 feet deep. The route was to be via Guildford, Loxwood and the Avon Valley. The cost was estimated at £7 millon. They were later asked to survey alternative lines. | |
March 1825 | A joint meeting is held to consider his and the other two schemes proposed. The meeting agrees that such a scheme could be achieved for less than £5 million and that it would be of great advantage. | |
September 1825 | He issues a report attacking the line and surveying methods of George and John (the younger) Rennie. | |
1827 | He and his brother were consulted by the Admiralty on a proposed canal to be called the Grand Imperial Ship Canal but they thought the scheme was not financially viable. | |
1827 | He and his brother were consulted by the Admiralty on a proposed canal to be called the Grand Imperial Ship Canal but they thought the scheme was not financially viable. | |
1827 | He issues a third report on the canal - now called the Grand Imperial Ship Canal on the orders of the Duke of Clarence. |
Description: Never authorised or built.
History: Two surveys of the line were made in 1796 one by Joseph Hill and the other by George Smith.
1796 | He did a survey for the proposed canal and estimated the cost at £127,000. | |
1796 | He made a survey of the route and estimated the cost as £157,566. | |
Before 1796 | Made an early survey for this route. |
Description: This abandoed waterway runs 11.75 miles from Louth to a channel joining the River Humber.
History: Authorised by an Act of 1763 and opened in 1764, fallen into disuse by 1915. It was closed by a warrant of the Minister of Transport on 8 August 1924.
See Priestley's Navigable Rivers and Canals for more information.
October 1756 | He reported on his preliminary survey of the proposed navigation. | |
18 February 1760 | The town clerk of Louth wrote to him asking for assistance. He replied five days later requesting more information and adds "P.S. Is the expense and practicallity the chief point, or the getting the Bill through Parliament on account of expected opposition?". | |
1 March 1760 | The town clerk of Louth wrote saying that little opposition was was expected and that it was desireable to get the canal Bill into Parliament in the next session. However, the promoters were not willing to proceed until he had confirmed John Grundy's report. | |
11 March 1760 | He replied to the letter of the 1st advising them to hasten slowly and explained that he was busy and would no wish them to delay their Bill because of him.He also wrote | |
7 August 1760 | He met John Grundy and went through Grundy's report and confirmed that Tetney Haven was the proper outfall to provide communication with the Trent so that flat bottom barges could navigate into Yorkshire without going to sea. He estimated the cost as £15,590 for a 'Two Barge Canal', £13,686 for a "One Barge Canal" and £10,884 for "Lighter drawing 2 feet". | |
7 August 1760 | Went though his proposal for a 9 lock, 11 mile, navigation with John Smeaton. | |
6 December 1762 | A petition was presented to parliament for a navigation based on his proposals and an Act was passed in March 1763. | |
1763 | Authorised by an Act. | |
1764 | Opened. | |
1915 | Fallen into disuse by 1915. | |
1924 | Closed by a warrant of the Minister of Transport on 8 August 1924. | |